BUKTI JELAS ANWAR ADALAH LELAKI Y ATAU TIDAK !!!

Bawah ini adalah sedutan artikel 73 dan 165 Evidence Act 1950 yang kemungkinan digunakan oleh pihak Pendakwa menjadi asas undang2 untuk menuntut hakim menggunakan kuasa untuk mengarahkan Anwar memberi sampel untuk menentukan DNAnya.

Comparison of signature, writing or seal with others admitted or proved

73. (1) In order to ascertain whether a signature, writing or seal is that of the person by whom it purports to have been written or made, any signature, writing or seal, admitted or proved to the satisfaction of the court to have been written or made by that person, may be compared by a witness or by the court with the one which is to be proved, although that signature, writing or seal has not been produced or proved for any other purpose.

(2) The court may direct any person present in court to write any words or figures for the purpose of enabling the court to compare the words or figures so written with any words or figures alleged to have been written by that person.

(3) This section applies also, with any necessary modifications, to finger impressions.

dan

Judge’s power to put questions or order production

165. The Judge may,in order to discover or to obtain proper proof of relevant facts, ask any question he pleases, in any form at any time, of any witness or of the parties, about any fact relevant or irrelevant; and may order the production of any document or
thing; and neither the parties nor their agents shall be entitled to make any objection to any such question or order, nor, without the leave of the court, to cross-examine any witness upon any answer given in reply to any such question:

Provided that—

(i) the judgment must be based upon facts declared by this Act to be relevant and duly proved;

(ii) this section shall not authorize any Judge to compel any witness to answer any question or to produce any document which the witness would be entitled to refuse to answer or produce under sections 121 to 131 if the question were asked or the document were called for by the adverse party; nor shall the Judge ask any question which it would be improper for any other person to ask under section 148 or 149; nor shall he dispense with the primary evidence of any document, except in the cases hereinbefore excepted.

Pendek kata,adalah menjadi tanggungjawab hakim untuk memastikan keadilan telah dijalankan.

Dalam hal ini,hakim mempunyai kausa untuk mengarahkan Anwar memberi sampel untuk dilakukan profil DNA dan mengesahkan samada Male Y itu dirinya atau pun tidak.

Itu saja keadilan dapat dicapai.Dengan tidak mengarahkan anwar.ini bermakna HAKIM menafikan hak Saiful untuk mendapatkan keadilan dan berat sebelah kepada si bontot ayam.

SUMBER UNSPINNERS

WAHAI ANWAR AL-JUBURI,KENAPA TAKUT SANGAT NAK BAGI DNA TU ??? KATA NAK TEGAKKAN KEADILAN DI MALAYSIA.LEPAS TU MACAM-MACAM LAGI NAK JANJI SAMPAI 100 HARI YEK ???

SAMPAI BILA KES INI AKAN BERJALAN ??? SAMPAI PRU 13 KER ??? ATAUPUN SAMPAI DAH JADI MACAM NIK AZIZ BARU NAK MENGAKU ???

ANWAR AL-JUBURI HARUS BERTAUBAT